[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should commits rather be buildable or small
From: |
Felix Lechner |
Subject: |
Re: Should commits rather be buildable or small |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Dec 2023 08:35:24 -0800 |
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 08 2023, Lars-Dominik Braun wrote:
> I’ve been updating Haskell packages in bulk in a single commit.
Making logically related commits was always my custom before arriving at
Guix. I still do so in all of my own projects.
The preference at Guix, however, is to split even mundane changes into
the tiniest parts possible---each affecting ideally only a single file.
The custom seems to be driven by concerns for the GNU ChangeLog, which
is generated automatically from the Git commit messages.
Kind regards
Felix
- Should commits rather be buildable or small, Saku Laesvuori, 2023/12/08
- Re: Should commits rather be buildable or small, Tomas Volf, 2023/12/08
- Re: Should commits rather be buildable or small, Lars-Dominik Braun, 2023/12/08
- Re: Should commits rather be buildable or small,
Felix Lechner <=
- Re: Should commits rather be buildable or small, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/12/08
- Re: Should commits rather be buildable or small, Saku Laesvuori, 2023/12/10
- Re: Should commits rather be buildable or small, Liliana Marie Prikler, 2023/12/10
- Re: Should commits rather be buildable or small, Attila Lendvai, 2023/12/10
- Re: Should commits rather be buildable or small, Ricardo Wurmus, 2023/12/10
- Re: Should commits rather be buildable or small, Attila Lendvai, 2023/12/10
- Re: Should commits rather be buildable or small, Philip McGrath, 2023/12/10
- Re: Should commits rather be buildable or small, Attila Lendvai, 2023/12/11
- Re: Should commits rather be buildable or small, Ricardo Wurmus, 2023/12/11