Re: Concerns/questions around Software Heritage Archive

[MSavoritias]

On 3/16/24 19:50, Christopher Baines wrote:
> Ian Eure <ian@retrospec.tv> writes:
>
> > Hi Guixy people,
> >
> > I’d never heard of SWH before I started hacking on Guix last fall, and
> > it struck me as rather a good idea.  However, I’ve seen some things
> > lately which have soured me on them.
> >
> > They appear to be using the archive to build LLMs:
> > https://www.softwareheritage.org/2024/02/28/responsible-ai-with-starcoder2/
> >
> > I was also distressed to see how poorly they treated a developer who
> > wished to update their name:
> > https://cohost.org/arborelia/post/4968198-the-software-heritag
> > https://cohost.org/arborelia/post/5052044-the-software-heritag
> >
> > GPL’d software I’ve created has been packaged for Guix, which I assume
> > means it’s been included in SWH.  While I’m dealing with their (IMO:
> > unethical) opt-out process, I likely also need to stop new copies from
> > being uploaded again in the future.
> >
> > Is there a way to indicate, in a Guix package, that it should *never*
> > be included in SWH?
> Not currently, and I don't really see the point in such a mechanism. If
> you really never want them to store your code, then you need to license
> it accordingly (and not make it free software).

You are talking about legal tho. Yes legally they can copy the code.

But what can Guix do socially to give people the choice? For reasons of 
consent that is.

> > I was also distressed to see how poorly they treated a developer who
> > wished to update their name:
> > https://cohost.org/arborelia/post/4968198-the-software-heritag
> > https://cohost.org/arborelia/post/5052044-the-software-heritag
> This is probably worth thinking about as Guix is in a similar situation
> regarding publishing source code, and people potentially wanting to
> change historical source code both in things Guix packages and Guix
> itself.
>
> Like Software Heritage, there's cryptographical implications for
> rewriting the Git history and modifying source tarballs or nars that
> contain source code.
>
> We have 17TiB of compressed source code and built software stored for
> bordeaux.guix.gnu.org now and we should probably work out how to handle
> people asking for things to be removed or changed (for any and all
> reasons).
>
> It's probably worth working out our position on this in advance of
> someone asking.

I would go a step further actually. Software Heritage is effectively 
breaking CoC of Guix now.

Im not proposing removing all code or something obviously that connects 
to Software Heritage, but there should be some social action we can take.


For example until the matter is resolved and Software Heritage 
implements a process that respects trans rights Software Heritage should 
not be welcome in Guix Spaces.


MSavoritias