[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unmaintained package?
From: |
Bob Rossi |
Subject: |
Re: unmaintained package? |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:30:19 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 06:50:05AM +0100, Hans Aberg wrote:
>
> On 16 Dec 2005, at 02:04, Bob Rossi wrote:
>
> >Am I correct in assuming that both flex and bison are unmaintained? or
> >is there an active community working on these projects?
>
> For Flex:
> http://flex.sourceforge.net/
> http://lex.sourceforge.net/
Thanks, I think the above are the active lists.
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-flex
I would advice against using the 2 above. They get no resonses, and are
loaded with SPAM. Thanks for the info!
Bob Rossi
- Re: unmaintained package?, (continued)
- Re: unmaintained package?, Joel E. Denny, 2005/12/18
- Re: unmaintained package?, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/19
- Re: unmaintained package?, Bob Rossi, 2005/12/19
- Re: unmaintained package?, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/20
- Re: unmaintained package?, Akim Demaille, 2005/12/20
- Re: unmaintained package?, Bob Rossi, 2005/12/20
- Message not available
- Re: unmaintained package?, Bob Rossi, 2005/12/20
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: unmaintained package?, Bob Rossi, 2005/12/22
- Re: unmaintained package?, Bob Rossi, 2005/12/29
Re: unmaintained package?, Hans Aberg, 2005/12/19
- Re: unmaintained package?,
Bob Rossi <=