[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bootstrapping
From: |
Nate Campi |
Subject: |
Re: Bootstrapping |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:44:15 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 02:50:28PM -0800, John Sechrest wrote:
> Nate Campi <nate@campin.net> writes:
>
> % A surprising amount of configuration could be shared across sites,
> % enabling networks to get up quickly, and run better. Consultants could
> % come into networks they've never been on before, but quickly solve
> % problems and roll out new services, since he/she already understands the
> % cfengine setup.
<snip>
> Right now, I am using Files to simulate what I need to get
> as I reach thru all of this stuff.
>
> Like:
>
> TrustedKeyFrom = ( Readfile(/var/mln/trustedhosts,1000))
>
> instead of saying
>
> TrustedKeyFrom = ( My list of hosts goes here)
>
> In this way, I should be able to mail to you a cf.XXX file and
> you should be able to put it into use.
>
> Mark mentions that there are CFengine Packages that can be built
> which end up with seperate name spaces, so that sharing
> files does not lead to collisions in the name spaces of the classes.
Good work.
> % This is what I'd want the community-contributed cfengine configs to come
> % from - actual use, practices proven on real networks. It would need to
> % be it's own project, with active contributers. I plan on starting it on
> % my own, then seeing if people want to join in once I have something
> % working to get at least a small network up from scratch. It would
> % probably need to be a custom debian distro on a CD, to bootstrap the
> % whole process from a gold server.
>
> This brings up many questions for me...
>
> A) Why would this not work as a component of the CFengine work that
> is already going on?
Well I suppose I mean separate mailing list, so as not to bother this
list.
> C) Do you care that there already is an ongoing project working
> on the same issue? (We got our sourceforge project approved recently)
Cool. I thought hard about going exactly the way you're going, with
UML's, right in line with the "utility computing" buzzword being slung
around a lot in the press and vendor marketing materials.
I decided against it, since we can make configuration of real hosts
almost as easy, and get all their performance. I have a surprising
number of hosts lacking on CPU, DISK and memory resources, mostly mail
servers. I need every last ounce of capacity out of a lot of my hosts.
There are very expensive and modern hardware platforms, it's just that
we have large clusters of mail and web servers that work very, very
hard.
--
Nate
"To succeed in life, you need two things: ignorance and confidence." - Samuel
Clemens
- Re: Bootstrapping, (continued)
- Re: Bootstrapping, Eric Sorenson, 2004/02/18
- Re: Bootstrapping, Nate Campi, 2004/02/18
- Re: Bootstrapping, John Sechrest, 2004/02/18
- Re: Bootstrapping, Tim Nelson, 2004/02/18
- Re: Bootstrapping, Nate Campi, 2004/02/18
- Re: Bootstrapping, John Sechrest, 2004/02/18
- Re: Bootstrapping, Tim Nelson, 2004/02/18
- Re: Bootstrapping,
Nate Campi <=
- Re: Bootstrapping, John Sechrest, 2004/02/18
- mln (was: Re: Bootstrapping), Tim Nelson, 2004/02/18
- Re: mln (was: Re: Bootstrapping), John Sechrest, 2004/02/18
- Re: mln (was: Re: Bootstrapping), Tim Nelson, 2004/02/18
- Re: mln (was: Re: Bootstrapping), John Sechrest, 2004/02/18
- Re: mln (was: Re: Bootstrapping), Tim Nelson, 2004/02/18
- Re: mln (was: Re: Bootstrapping), John Sechrest, 2004/02/18
- Re: Bootstrapping, Luke A. Kanies, 2004/02/19
- Re: Bootstrapping, Mark . Burgess, 2004/02/19
- Re: Bootstrapping, John Sechrest, 2004/02/19