[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?
From: |
Galen Boyer |
Subject: |
Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone? |
Date: |
19 Dec 2001 14:25:41 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 |
On Wed, 19 Dec 2001, address@hidden wrote:
>
> With respect, this sentence should read "...lays down four
> criteria for software to be considered free under the FSF
> definition of the word 'free'."
Not on a GNU list. The default should be the GNU definition.
Other newsgroups, I agree.
--
Galen deForest Boyer
Sweet dreams and flying machines in pieces on the ground.
Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?, Heribert Maier, 2001/12/18
RE: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?, Jeremy Bowen, 2001/12/19
Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?, Jeremy Bowen, 2001/12/20
Re: [h-e-w] Re: Gnus, anyone?, Peter Davis, 2001/12/20