[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lamers on IRC
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: lamers on IRC |
Date: |
Sat, 28 May 2022 06:54:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Thomas Lord wrote:
> Every user had a theoretical capacity to operate their own
> host or to shop around for one who carried the alt groups
> they preferred. Of course, the whole thing being P2P, hosts
> upstream of a given host could choose to shun it and hosts
> could shop around for their choice of upstream hosts.
Uhm, "upstream host", is that another computer that receives
to the same feed as you so thus gets your posts or what is it?
> Google used its economic power and social influence to first
> centralize what was left of mainstream netnews and then to
> kill it off.
Well, you can tune into nntp.aioe.org with Gnus this very
instant and see how useful it is. But killed - no.
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
- Re: lamers on IRC, (continued)
- Re: lamers on IRC, Emanuel Berg, 2022/05/27
- Re: lamers on IRC, Samuel Banya, 2022/05/27
- Re: lamers on IRC, Emanuel Berg, 2022/05/27
- Re: lamers on IRC, Thomas Lord, 2022/05/28
- Re: lamers on IRC, Emanuel Berg, 2022/05/28
- Re: lamers on IRC, Thomas Lord, 2022/05/28
- Re: lamers on IRC,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: lamers on IRC, Thomas Lord, 2022/05/28
- Re: lamers on IRC, Thomas Lord, 2022/05/28
- Re: lamers on IRC, Emanuel Berg, 2022/05/28
- Re: lamers on IRC, Emanuel Berg, 2022/05/28
- Re: lamers on IRC, Thomas Lord, 2022/05/28
- Re: lamers on IRC, Emanuel Berg, 2022/05/28
- Re: lamers on IRC, Thomas Lord, 2022/05/28
- Re: lamers on IRC, Emanuel Berg, 2022/05/29
- Re: lamers on IRC, Emanuel Berg, 2022/05/29
- Re: lamers on IRC, Thomas Lord, 2022/05/29