[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Compiling STL succeeds/fails with different version of g++ on alpha
|
From: |
Ulrich Eckhardt |
|
Subject: |
Re: Compiling STL succeeds/fails with different version of g++ on alpha DEC Tru64? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 07:23:15 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KNode/0.8.2 |
Sharshera wrote:
> I have a c++ code that I can compile successfully on g++ 2.96 while I
> can't under 3.4.1 and 3.0?
Firstly: http://gcc-2.96.html
Secondly: show some code, I rather tend to share reds floyd's opinion.
> Are these two known to have issues with STL?
The issue is called porting from pre- or non-standard C++ to standard C++.
> I know this is a very general question but I am just wondering if STL
> is better supported in some version while not in the others.
Indeed, it is too general. Just for your info also: the STL is dead and has
been unmaintained during the last years. What is alive is the C++
standardlibrary, which has been strongly influenced by the STL but still
is not the same.
Uli
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html
http://parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/