[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: using the right tool for the job!

From: Donald Sharp
Subject: Re: using the right tool for the job!
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 09:38:12 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.4i

On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 03:22:04AM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> [ On Thursday, July 19, 2001 at 01:17:10 (-0400), Lenny Foner wrote: ]
> > Subject: using the right tool for the job!
> >
> > To say I doubt this so-called explanation it putting it mildly.
> > I think you just didn't think through the implications of your
> > actions, and are trying to backpedal now that someone's called
> > you on it.  And I don't really care to hear yet another excuse
> > about how you're so much cleverer than anyone else in doing this.
> Oh, I'm not back-pedalling!  Quite the opposite!  I thought through my
> actions very carefully and proceeded with very deliberate purpose!  I'd
> do it all again (though maybe with about half the content -- two parts
> would proabably have been suffient to get the point across with
> sufficient irony; I just couldn't be bothered to pre-test it to see how
> many parts it would be broken down into by my MUA).

Alright this just pushes me over the edge.  Why didn't you send
these attachments to the people you were arguing with?  I
wasn't interested in any of the arguements that you have ongoing so I 
stopped reading them.  Instead I get 1/2 meg of crap in my inbox.  Who/what
are you trying to teach a lesson to?  and why did it include the 99% of
people on this list who could give a rat's ass?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]