[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Coflict marker detection proposal

From: Greg A. Woods
Subject: Re: Coflict marker detection proposal
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:08:10 -0400 (EDT)

[ On Friday, July 20, 2001 at 06:56:43 (-0400), Noel L Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: Coflict marker detection proposal
> I don't recall participating in a _philosophical discussion on theory_ but I 
> do
> recall discussing practical features that currently exist in tools than CVS.

Well, your memory really is short then.  Why we were discussing
theoretical implementations of better handling for non-mergable files
just the other day!

> I (and it looks like many others) disagree.  CVS must not insist on this.

Well it does anyway -- I just want it returned to enforcing its
insistence instead of making lame warnings.

> Then please call your tool something other than CVS (GVS maybe ;-)

I haven't called it anything yet, but if I did call it something I might
use the name NCVS (and because we now know your memory is really short,
let me remind you that of course this serves as at least the second
claim to that name that I've made).

                                                        Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098      VE3TCP      <address@hidden>     <address@hidden>
Planix, Inc. <address@hidden>;   Secrets of the Weird <address@hidden>

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]