[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Race condition merging branches

From: Alex Holst
Subject: Re: Race condition merging branches
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:22:14 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

Quoting Carel Fellinger (address@hidden):
> but this obviously leaves out the stuff in branch_n, so I have
> to use the generic branch tag and switch command order:
>   cvs update -j branch_n-1 -j branch
>   cvs rtag -r branch branch_n
> but how can I be sure that in between those two cvs commands nobody
> be left out in the next iteration of branch merges were 

This seems like another problem that should be solved by interacting with
humans rather than hoping a tool will do it for you. A process should be
defined that outlines who is allowed to merge branches and how they must
notify other committers..

I prefer the dark of the night, after midnight and before four-thirty,
when it's more bare, more hollow.        

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]