[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: update

From: Kaz Kylheku
Subject: Re: update
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 00:56:29 GMT
User-agent: slrn/ (Linux)

In article <address@hidden>, Walsh, Matthew wrote:
>What I want is:
>cvs co -rTAG module
>cvs update -rBRANCH
>without losing anything out of my sandbox that isn't BRANCHed.

I'd love to tell you that the branched/non-branched mixing you are
doing is a poor idea CM, but then I suspect you'd probably tell me that
my viewpoint is rather naive, and that people all over do this with
superior, proprietary tools.

Meta-CVS: version control with directory structure versioning over top of CVS.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]