[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document.
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document. |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Sep 2004 14:07:32 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@knm.org.pl> writes:
> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
>
>>> Yes, this means that there is no good way to distinguish between the
>>> two dominant emacs-variants.
>>
>> Emacs and XEmacs. What is bad about that?
>
> That "Emacs" also denotes the whole family.
Then say "Emacs family". Or just "Emacs and XEmacs". I don't know of
significant other family members.
> I don't know whether "FSF Emacs" or "GNU Emacs" is more appropriate.
Both are inappropriate. It is "Emacs" and "XEmacs".
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., Brian Palmer, 2004/09/18
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., JEDIDIAH, 2004/09/17
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., Aquila Deus, 2004/09/18
Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document., wlcna, 2004/09/20