info-gnus-english
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document.


From: Stephen J. Turnbull
Subject: Re: Fatal error (11). Emacs/ Linux hosed my very long document.
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:55:32 +0900
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.5 (chayote, linux)

>>>>> "Stefan" == Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

    >>> Emacs and XEmacs.  What is bad about that?

    >> That "Emacs" also denotes the whole family.

    Stefan> No, you can say (X)Emacs, or you can say "emacsen", ...

Both of which rms deprecates as unclear, as I suspect you know.

>From the Emacs FAQ (draft, 2004/08/28 per personal communication from
David Kastrup):

    Terms such as ``Emacsen'' and ``(X)Emacs'' are not wrong, but they
    are not very clear, so it is better to write ``Emacs and XEmacs.''

It simply is not possible to phrase certain things in a way that
everyone will be comfortable with.

-- 
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences     http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba                    Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
               Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
              ask what your business can "do for" free software.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]