info-gnus-english
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gnus cannot describe all Quimby (news.gnus.org) groups


From: Tassilo Horn
Subject: Re: Gnus cannot describe all Quimby (news.gnus.org) groups
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 09:48:07 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)

DekuDekuplex@Yahoo.com (Benjamin L. Russell) writes:

Hi Benjamin,

>> It has nothing to do with that being your third nntp server.  I did some
>> more testing and added news.gnus.org as my fourth nntp server.
>>
>> (add-to-list 'gnus-secondary-select-methods
>>              '(nntp "Quimby"
>>                     (nntp-address "news.gnus.de")))
>>
>> That's the only entry for Quimby, and since there's no group listed and
>> "Has read" doesn't look like a proper description, it looks like a
>> server issue to me.
>
> You added news.gnus.de, instead of news.gnus.org; are you sure that
> those two NNTP addresses point to the same server?

Argh, stupid me!  Ok, now I did that with the right address, did M-x
gnus-group-describe-all-groups RET, and those are all Quimby groups I
got described:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
11 matches for "Quimby" in buffer: *Group*
   2026:      *: nntp+Quimby:local.general Local general group
   2216:      *: nntp+Quimby:control.cancel Cancel messages (no posting)
   4929:      *: nntp+Quimby:control  Various control messages (no posting)
   8872:      *: nntp+Quimby:         Has read
  10485:      *: nntp+Quimby:local.test Local test group
  10798:      *: nntp+Quimby:.        
  11634:      *: nntp+Quimby:junk     Unfiled articles (no posting)
  17588:      *: nntp+Quimby:control.rmgroup Newsgroup removal control messages 
(no posting)
  17647:      *: nntp+Quimby:control.newgroup Newsgroup creation control 
messages (no posting)
  24293:      *: nntp+Quimby:215      Descriptions in form "group description"
  27158:      *: nntp+Quimby:control.checkgroups Hierarchy check control 
messages (no posting)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

These are still not all groups, and the nameless group, the group 215,
and "." don't look correct.  And the description 'Descriptions in form
"group description"' pretty much looks like a parsing issue.

Bye,
Tassilo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]