[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Supporting POSIX *users*
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: Supporting POSIX *users* |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:35:14 -0500 |
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 17:20 +0100, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 05:13:13PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> > If a user runs a unsecure program, and that program screws things up,
> > it is the users fault.
>
> The cool thing about a secure system is that the program is unable to screw
> things up unless the user has explicitly given it access to all its private
> data, which is highly unlikely.
Yes, but the *really* cool thing about a secure system is that even when
the user does this, they can't screw *me* up.
shap
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/01
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/01
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/01
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/01
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/01