[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Supporting POSIX *users*
From: |
Christopher Nelson |
Subject: |
RE: Supporting POSIX *users* |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:45:17 -0700 |
> I don't know about guns, but riffles don't have any safety switch.
> And comparing a gun to software is utterly silly, I have
> never been able to kill my self with software, but I won't
> even try to point a riffle up my nostril even if I know the
> barrel is empty.
1) all legal semi-automatic or automatic weapons have a safety. (in the
U.S.)
2) other types of weapons have *implicit* safeties which require you to
deliberately unlock, load, and relock a mechanism. Bolt action rifles
meet this requirement. Revolvers have an implicit safety in that you
must first cock the hammer. Double-action revolvers have a safety.
3) I was talking about shooting yourself in the foot. I have a friend
who shot himself in the leg with a .44 because his horse shied while he
was roping another horse, the lariat got wrapped in the holster, and
*boom*. He didn't have his safety on, or else the safety was badly
designed if it could be accidentally depressed.
4) bad software *does* kill people. Software controls pacemakers,
airplanes, cars, and many other devices that people depend on for their
life.
-={C}=-
RE: Supporting POSIX *users*, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/01
RE: Supporting POSIX *users*, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/01
RE: Supporting POSIX *users*,
Christopher Nelson <=