[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Supporting POSIX *users*
From: |
Christopher Nelson |
Subject: |
RE: Supporting POSIX *users* |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 10:57:16 -0700 |
>
> A) Hit me in the face
> B) Talk to the manager to make sure I lose my job, or
> C) All of the above?
>
> Neither.
>
> Who do you kick in the ass if you let anyone use your
> console? The system admin, or the person who left the console open?
>
> If a user runs a unsecure program, and that program screws
> things up, it is the users fault.
>
> Put in bad oil in the engine so it stops working, or causes a
> crash, then you don't blame the car manufacturer do you?
While that is true, consider that most people who are that ignorant got
to a lube shop to have it done for them. Therefore, for a little extra
money a service is provided that insulates them from their ignorance.
Equally, an operating system that provides insulation for a user from
their own ignorance would be much more desirable in the eyes of
potential users and/or system administrators.
-={C}=-
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, (continued)
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/01
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Bas Wijnen, 2005/11/01
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/01
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/01
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/01
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/01
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/01
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/01
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/01
- Re: Supporting POSIX *users*, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/01
RE: Supporting POSIX *users*,
Christopher Nelson <=
RE: Supporting POSIX *users*, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/01
RE: Supporting POSIX *users*, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/01