[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Meaning of filesystems (was: Re: Sysadmins)
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
Subject: |
Meaning of filesystems (was: Re: Sysadmins) |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 08:24:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi,
> If we are going to move forward with a totally persistent OS (i.e. a
> single-level-store[1] for all data),
Aside from the question whether we really *want* a totally persistent
system: The single level store doesn't directly follow from it. It
probably makes sense in such a system, but I do not see why it would be
mandatory.
> then we need to start talking about the "filesystem" as a data store
> that has objects and capabilities associated with those objects and
> get rid of the classical concept of filesystems.
Persistence only means that you do not strictly *need* filesystems; but
if you use them, the concept of a filesystem isn't really different --
only it's role in the overall system.
Having said that, I do not believe that we will go without a global
filesystem -- even if applications will never have access to all of it.
-antrik-
- Re: DRM, (continued)
- Re: DRM, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/06
- Re: DRM, Michal Suchanek, 2005/11/06
- Re: DRM, Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/06
- Re: DRM, Michal Suchanek, 2005/11/06
- Re: DRM, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/06
- TC (was: Re: Sysadmins), olafBuddenhagen, 2005/11/07
- Re: TC (was: Re: Sysadmins), Peter 'p2' De Schrijver, 2005/11/07
- Re: TC (was: Re: Sysadmins), olafBuddenhagen, 2005/11/07
- Re: TC (was: Re: Sysadmins), Alfred M\. Szmidt, 2005/11/07
- Re: Sysadmins, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/04
Meaning of filesystems (was: Re: Sysadmins),
olafBuddenhagen <=
Message not available
Re: Sysadmins, Emmanuel Colbus, 2005/11/03
Re: Sysadmins, Emmanuel Colbus, 2005/11/03
Re: Sysadmins, Emmanuel Colbus, 2005/11/05
RE: Sysadmins, Christopher Nelson, 2005/11/05