[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: On PATH_MAX
From: |
Jonathan S. Shapiro |
Subject: |
Re: On PATH_MAX |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Nov 2005 11:16:25 -0500 |
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 15:02 +0100, ness wrote:
> The problem Jonathan pointed out is that *others* will delay. This is
> not the case, as the server will be multithreaded.
I think that this reply and mine crossed in the mail, but just in case:
Not if you want that server to be remotely robust, it won't.
shap
- Re: On PATH_MAX, (continued)
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/08
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Bas Wijnen, 2005/11/08
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/08
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Bas Wijnen, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Bas Wijnen, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Bas Wijnen, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX,
Jonathan S. Shapiro <=
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/09
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Bas Wijnen, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2005/11/10
- Re: On PATH_MAX, ness, 2005/11/10