Re: Challenge: Find potential use cases for non-trivial confinement

[Bas Wijnen]

On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 01:05:16PM +0200, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> > I've also realised that I don't really understand who pays for the
> > resources in the different versions of confinement.  I guess it's time
> > for some more reading.
> 
> That's always the parent, but not in the same way.

As I just wrote in a separate e-mail, that's not how I use the word "parent".
To me, the parent is the process performing the system call creating the
process, which will be the constructor if it is used.

Hopefully this will reduce the confusion a bit...

Thanks,
Bas

-- 
I encourage people to send encrypted e-mail (see http://www.gnupg.org).
If you have problems reading my e-mail, use a better reader.
Please send the central message of e-mails as plain text
   in the message body, not as HTML and definitely not as MS Word.
Please do not use the MS Word format for attachments either.
For more information, see http://129.125.47.90/e-mail.html

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature