Re: [MLB] Tag inferrence code needs improving

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Oct 26, 2000, Nick Hudson <address@hidden> wrote:

>> Ok, I see the point now.  Yes, aliases would be a
>> nice addition, and so might be searching for additional compilers.

> What's the best way to approach do this then?

My first impression is that it wouldn't be easy, and it would probably
be better (and easier) to simply specify the configuration tag you'd
like libtool to use, instead of letting it attempt (and fail) to infer
it.  Of course, this will fail in case you *do* have multiple
compilers with different options.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  address@hidden, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me