[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts)
From: |
Tim Mooney |
Subject: |
Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts) |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:27:49 -0500 (CDT) |
In regard to: Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Bruce Korb said (at...:
>Tim Mooney wrote:
>
>> Something similar to what's done on page 147 (section 6.7) of K&R2e --
>
>K&R2e == ANSI
>
>> Of course, most of the functions still use the K&R style arg definitions.
>
>K&R1e.
Thanks for clarifying what I was trying to say, but not being quite explicit
enough, apparently.
BTW, you trimmed a bit too much of my address, which is why Gary's response
bounced for him.
Tim
--
Tim Mooney address@hidden
Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building (701) 231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), (continued)
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Robert Collins, 2001/09/08
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Bruce Korb, 2001/09/08
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Gary V. Vaughan, 2001/09/10
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Bruce Korb, 2001/09/10
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Gary V. Vaughan, 2001/09/10
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Tim Mooney, 2001/09/11
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Bruce Korb, 2001/09/12
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Gary V. Vaughan, 2001/09/13
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Gary V. Vaughan, 2001/09/13
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Tim Mooney, 2001/09/13
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts),
Tim Mooney <=
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Gary V. Vaughan, 2001/09/13
- Re: ltdl.c and 1.4.1 (type conflicts), Tim Mooney, 2001/09/13