[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Libtool 2.1b test results

From: Mike Frysinger
Subject: Re: Libtool 2.1b test results
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 01:03:40 -0500
User-agent: KMail/1.9.7

On Tuesday 12 February 2008, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 09:22:19AM CET:
> > * Mike Frysinger wrote on Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 08:37:31AM CET:
> > > # Whether or not to optimize for fast installation.
> > > fast_install=needless
> >
> > This looks very weird to me, and I cannot explain it at all.  Did you use
> > any patches on top of 2.1b?  You didn't `./configure --disable-shared'
> > either.  And shlibpath_overrides_runpath is no, too.
> Can you try to find out why this happens for you?  Either put 'set -x'
> as second line in the configure script, or embrace the code regions that
> set enable_fast_install with 'set -x'/'set +x', and post the (gziped,
> please) output.

i'm more than happy to run any test you may like, but i really cant offer any 
insight myself at this point in time as i'm not intimately familiar with 
libtool.  i really only touch the internals as bug reports from Gentoo 

here's the output from running:
sh -x ./configure

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Attachment: libtool-2.1b-configure.log.lzma
Description: Binary data

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]