Re: Building on CygWin

[Robin Davies]

Ok. I take it back. I've set some of my own jazz charts using 1.5.55 and the
spacing is amazingly beautiful. With 1.4.8 I was using forced \break's to
give the charts some breathing room (and cover up a lot of ugliness when
setting chords tightly). But with 1.5.55 they set perfectly without any
forced breaks.

Vertical spacing between chord parts has improved too.

Good job! (Just in case anyone forgets to say, often enough, how beautiful
the output of lilypond is).

I'll go through some of the samples I generated that brought about the
original comment and see whether I can be more specific. My vague impression
was that the vertical positioning of note heads was a little off in some of
the regression tests, but that's definitely not a problem in my stuff.

Regards,

Robin Davies.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Han-Wen Nienhuys" <address@hidden>
To: "Robin Davies" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 3:20 PM
Subject: Building on CygWin


> address@hidden writes:
> > Voila. So far, I've run a handful of sample files all of which seem to
work
> > properly as far as I can tell (although the spacing is kinda ugly).
>
> Bugreport?  Lily 1.5 should have better spacing than 1.4, instead of
worse.
>
>
> --
>
> Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden    | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel