[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Configurable spacing
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Configurable spacing |
Date: |
Mon, 13 May 2002 12:19:34 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
> Hopefully the subject hasn't been totally forgot.
> Generally 1.5 produce wider scores than 1.4 - often I need to use 1.4
> simply because the spacing in 1.5 is too so that the music doesn't fit
> in a decent amount of staff-lines.
If you can reduce the problme to a simple file, I'll have a
look. There should not be much difference between 1.5 and 1.4. And
check if this patch helps:
--- spacing-spanner.cc.~1.72.~ Sun May 5 15:44:49 2002
+++ spacing-spanner.cc Mon May 13 12:17:42 2002
@@ -558,7 +558,8 @@
bool ragged = to_boolean (me->paper_l ()->get_scmvar ("raggedright"));
Real strength = (ragged) ? 1.0 : 1 / (max_note_space - max_fixed_note_space);
Real distance = (ragged) ? max_fixed_note_space : max_note_space;
- Spaceable_grob::add_spring (lc, rc, distance, strength, expand_only);
+ // Spaceable_grob::add_spring (lc, rc, distance, strength, expand_only);
+ Spaceable_grob::add_spring (lc, rc, distance, strength, false);
}
void
> Btw, what is the general opinion on convert-ly. How much does it need to
> convert? I.e. does it need to convert artihmetic-basicspace settings, or
> should it just produce a warning and a reference to documentation of how
> to perform the changes manually?
I think it should simply ignore those settings. We tune and change the
settings and internals all the time. If you want to have portable
files, don't mess with them.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/