Re: Request for comments: Redesign of TimeSignature

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden writes:
> 
> 
> On 23 May 2002, Laura Conrad wrote:
> > ...
> > If anyone wants to implement maxima, I think it looks like a longa
> > with the notehead about twice as wide.
> 
> This has already been for quite a long time in lily. ;-)
> Just say something like: c\maxima
> 
> > Speaking of which, if you are going to support mensural polyphony, one
> > thing that should change is the way barlines propagate between staves.
> > The fact that there's a barline in the top staff shouldn't necessarily
> > imply a barline in the others.
> > This would also make proofreading
> > easier.
> 
> This should be possible by adding/removing various engravers from/to
> various contexts.  I will think about it.

Remove the timing-engraver from toplevel and insert in staff. Or set
Staff.whichBar manually to get a barline.

-- 

Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden    | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/