[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: i18n 2nd time
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: i18n 2nd time |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 16:03:58 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > as a way of writing "foo\nbar". We use lots of instances of "foo
> > bar", eg.
>
> We use? Make that: during 1.5, al lot of instances ... were introduced.
> Those should probably be fixed, as they're deprecated in gcc-3.1, and
> will thus probably not compile in later versions.
Well, correction: "I use". I suggest we don't fix this until a GCC is
released that really removes the feature. I find easily editable
docstrings more important adhering than some stupid standard which
isn't really enforced yet.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/
- i18n 2nd time, Kopecek Tomas, 2002/06/12
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Juergen Reuter, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/13
- Re: i18n 2nd time,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: i18n 2nd time, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/13
Re: i18n 2nd time, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2002/06/13