Re: [patch] a few misc refman things (resubmitted)

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

address@hidden writes:
> On Thu, 05 Sep 2002 17:57:13 +0200
> J <address@hidden> wrote:
> > GP> Now for this patch.  Adds a short warning that \slurUp won't affect
> > GP> phrasing slurs (thanks to Atte Andre Jensen for that suggestion), and
> > GP> also a warning that if you want \slurUp to affect a \grace note, the
> > GP> \slurUp has to be inside the \grace.
> > 
> > It would have been wise to talk about \phrasingSlurUp, et al. (which does
> > exist).  The newbie this all done for won't understand anything that's
> > written in the Lilypond Internals.
> 
> Thanks; I didn't realize that.
> 
> Changelog:
> 2002-09-14   Graham Percival <address@hidden>
> 
>       * Documentation/user/refman.itely: warns that \slurFoo doesn't affect
>       phrasing slurs, and warns that a warning that if you want \slurUp to
>       affect a grace note, the \slurUp must be inside the \grace section.

your example is misleading. If you do

     \grace {
            \slurDown
        c4 ( }
     ) c4 c4 ()
     \slurBoth

you get even more interesting results.


--
Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   |   http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen