[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LilyPond 2.1.2 released
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: LilyPond 2.1.2 released |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Dec 2003 00:07:11 +0100 |
followup to lilypond-devel
address@hidden writes:
> Hi Han-Wen,
>
> I am rebuilding Pedro's Debian packages, as usual. However,
> a dear user missed the lilypond.vim file last time. It is
> definitely not contained in any Debian packages. May I ask
> you to check whether it is actually installed by the vanilla
> build system? I can't really see through that complicated
It's in the .tar.gz , it's not installed by default. You should take
up this issue with your Favorite Package Maintainer (tm).
> jungle. In the previous release one could also find a
> lilypond.wordlist.vim or similar; it is also gone now. I
> have no idea what these files are, when they were missed
> from the the previous package, I simply mailed them to the
> requesting person, and that was it. Could you enlighten me,
> please?
I think they're generated now.
>
> As a side note, lily/parser.yy #includes <stdio.h> twice,
> while lily/lily-guile.cc does not #include <ctype.h> at all.
> Are these bugs?
fixed.
> By the way, I am reaching the point where most of the time I
> can make Lily do what I want, and what's more, the solution
> starts to seem natural... :) I have the feeling that the
> tutorial/user manual goes a bit too far in hiding the
> momentarily unnecessary background, making the 'second step'
> very hard to make. Would it be possible to add some small
> print here and there?
Sure it's possible, but we have to be careful with making the tutorial
too complex. Too much trees will obscure the forest; I'd rather have
the second step in some manual parts that follow the tutorial.
Any ideas?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen