[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug or bad wording in manual?
|
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
|
Subject: |
bug or bad wording in manual? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:15:08 +0200 |
bug.
address@hidden writes:
> no-reset
> This is the same as default but with accidentals lasting ?forever?
> and not only until the next measure
>
> If I understand that sentence correctly, then in the below example
> (taken from the manual, BTW), the second cis should have no accidental.
> However, in 2.3.16 it does. Is this a bug, or have I misunderstood
> the no-rest style?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen