lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug or bad wording in manual?


From: Graham Percival
Subject: bug or bad wording in manual?
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 20:46:57 -0700

no-reset
This is the same as default but with accidentals lasting “forever” and not only until the next measure

If I understand that sentence correctly, then in the below example (taken from the manual, BTW), the second cis should have no accidental. However, in 2.3.16 it does. Is this a bug, or have I misunderstood the no-rest style?


\version "2.3.16"
\bookpaper {raggedright = ##t }
{ \relative c' {
#(set-accidental-style 'no-reset)
c1 cis cis c
}}





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]