Re: bug or bad wording in manual?

[Erik Sandberg]

On Wednesday 15 September 2004 05.46, Graham Percival wrote:
> no-reset
>   This is the same as default but with accidentals lasting  “forever”
> and not only until the next measure
>
> If I understand that sentence correctly, then in the below example
> (taken from the manual, BTW), the second cis should have no accidental.
>   However, in 2.3.16 it does.  Is this a bug, or have I misunderstood
> the no-rest style?
>
>
> \version "2.3.16"
> \bookpaper {raggedright = ##t }
> { \relative c' {
> #(set-accidental-style 'no-reset)
> c1 cis cis c
> }}
>

Seems to be fixed now.

erik