Re: Bug status

[Erik Sandberg]

On Saturday 25 September 2004 20.36, Graham Percival wrote:
> On 24-Sep-04, at 2:31 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > address@hidden writes:
> >> Add boxed-rehearsal-mark to this. It is now worse than in 2.2, the
> >> bottom line
> >> is way off. see attachment.
> >
> > There is something very fishy with this one. The -f ps version is
> > perfect, as is the -f tex. Only when used through lilypond-book, it is
> > wrong.
>
> Is this the problem that's in the manual section on Rehearsal marks?
>
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.3/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/
> Rehearsal-marks.html

Yes, it's exactly the same.

Erik