[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug status
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Bug status |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Sep 2004 01:50:08 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
> On Saturday 25 September 2004 20.36, Graham Percival wrote:
> > On 24-Sep-04, at 2:31 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > > address@hidden writes:
> > >> Add boxed-rehearsal-mark to this. It is now worse than in 2.2, the
> > >> bottom line
> > >> is way off. see attachment.
> > >
> > > There is something very fishy with this one. The -f ps version is
> > > perfect, as is the -f tex. Only when used through lilypond-book, it is
> > > wrong.
> >
> > Is this the problem that's in the manual section on Rehearsal marks?
> >
> > http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.3/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/
> > Rehearsal-marks.html
>
> Yes, it's exactly the same.
Take a look at the regression test for part combining. Hopefully that
makes it clear what part combining should look like.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen