[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FretDiagrams Architecture
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: FretDiagrams Architecture |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:25:48 +0100 |
address@hidden writes:
> will produce two chord labels (both D), and two FretDiagrams (which will
> be different items from the hash table). I think this feature could be
> convenient for those who may prefer to have multiple fret diagrams for a
> chord in a piece.
>
> What do you think?
I think that
a. we are storing chords in the wrong way. In retrospect, I find
root + list of (step, alteration) tuples
more logical
b. using the octave to store different variants is misuse of that
less-than-perfect storage model. I think that we should have some
kind of ChordAlternativeEvent to store the extra information.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
Re: FretDiagrams Architecture, Carl Sorensen, 2004/11/24