|
From: | Mats Bengtsson |
Subject: | Re: doc help: 11.2.1 |
Date: | Mon, 08 Aug 2005 12:44:39 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 |
I realized this after my previous answer. Please take a look at what I wrote in the current CVS and see if if makes more sense. /Mats Graham Percival wrote:
On 8-Aug-05, at 12:58 AM, Mats Bengtsson wrote:Regarding \line {...}, you are right that a literal translation of #:line( ...) corresponds to \line {...}, but there is no need to write out the \line command since {...} is equivalent to \line {...}. I'll add a note in "8.1.7 Overview of ...".I'm even more confused now. Are you sure about that? In here, http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2005-05/msg00312.html didn't Nicolas say that \line is _not_ automatically added to {...} ? Cheers, - Graham
-- ============================================= Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: address@hidden WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe =============================================
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |