|
From: | Mats Bengtsson |
Subject: | Re: doc help: 11.2.1 |
Date: | Tue, 09 Aug 2005 09:51:01 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 |
Nicolas, could you please give some expert comments on what I wrote in Documentation/user/programming-interface.itely in the latest CVS. I keep getting confused on these issues. Especially since I noticed by accident today that (markup #:line (#:finger "1 " "A" )) seems to behave exactly the same as (markup #:finger "1 " "A" ) so the line command at the top level of the markup is implicit even when you use the Scheme syntax (markup ...) not only in \markup{...}. /Mats Nicolas Sceaux wrote:
Graham Percival <address@hidden> writes:According to the docs, these two expressions are the same: (markup #:column (#:line (#:bold #:italic "hello" #:raise 0.4 "world") #:bigger #:line ("foo" "bar" "baz"))) \markup \column < { \bold \italic "hello" \raise #0.4 "world" } \bigger { foo bar baz } > Shouldn't the lilypond code be this instead: \markup \column { \line { \bold \italic "hello" \raise #0.4 "world" } \line {\bigger { foo bar baz } } ie didn't \column change away from being \column < > ? I also wonder about the Lilypond { ... } that's in the middle of the table below that example -- again, shouldn't that be \line { ... } ?Sorry, I missed to update this section when the markup syntax had been changed. You're right on both of your remarks. nicolas _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list address@hidden http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
-- ============================================= Mats Bengtsson Signal Processing Signals, Sensors and Systems Royal Institute of Technology SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Sweden Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463 Fax: (+46) 8 790 7260 Email: address@hidden WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe =============================================
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |