[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and
From: |
Erik Sandberg |
Subject: |
Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:02:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.1 |
On Thursday 18 August 2005 11.56, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Erik Sandberg wrote:
> > This makes it hard for us to steal the SCORE experts right now. I think
> > it's too difficult to do this kind of tweaks in lilypond right now, and
> > the tweaks will break after each new version. (however, I don't know
> > enough about
>
> That's not true. However, I don't guarantee that they won't break -
> which is something different.
I was thinking about minor extra-offset tweaks, which make up for mistakes
done by lily. You are almost guaranteed that they will break between
versions, since layout bugs regularly are fixed in lily.
> > As you say, it could be useful to start a constructive dialogue with the
> > SCORE folks, to
> > (a) see what it would require (in terms of improved program design) to
> > make them join us.
> > (b) get inspiration from their engraving expertise.
>
> I think it should be the other way around. We need some samples that
> work flawlessly in Lily, but require a huge amount of effort in SCORE.
> That will persuade them to try Lily. Then, they can sponsor me for
> adding what's still missing :-)
>
> Of course, I might have a different perspective from you :-)
I think we're talking about different things: you're talking about how to
convince them, I just suggested what we could try to learn by talking to
them.
I was assuming that the deepest SCORE gurus probably will need a way of
tweaking which is as powerful as SCORE's. (disclaimer: I don't know the
details of either SCORE's or lily's tweaking mechanisms). Perhaps this would
be the equivalent of music streams for grobs, or a way to redefine engraver
behaviour in Scheme. I don't know. In any case, they will probably be
uninterested in switching unless they know that something sufficiently
powerful can be implemented.
A fairly unrelated question is: Why are so many preferring PMX/MusiXTeX to
Lily? I often have better chances finding good MusiXTeX scores on Werner
Icking archive, than finding them on mutopia.
--
Erik
- Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/16
- Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Pedro Kröger, 2005/08/17
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Johannes Schindelin, 2005/08/17
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Pedro Kröger, 2005/08/17
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Trevor Baca, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Erik Sandberg, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration,
Erik Sandberg <=
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Trevor Baca, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Graham Percival, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Trevor Baca, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Pedro Kröger, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Trevor Baca, 2005/08/18
- Re: Sponsoring lilypond development Was Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Laura Conrad, 2005/08/18