[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: a new lilypond build failure
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
Subject: |
Re: a new lilypond build failure |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:55:43 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Thomas Bushnell BSG <address@hidden> writes:
> At the very least, the code in lily.scm should be fixed to set the
> running-from-gui? flag on a sensible basis. Failing that, the --safe
> switch should be honored by lily-parser-scheme.cc.
I misunderstood here the purpose of the --safe flag (thinking,
incorrectly, that it was intended to make the program's execution safe
from the bug I was seeing!). (It didn't help that "man lilypond" told
me nothing of the meaning of the flag...)
- a new lilypond build failure, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/10/21
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/10/21
- Re: a new lilypond build failure,
Thomas Bushnell BSG <=
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/10/23
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/10/23
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/10/24
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/10/24
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/10/24
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/10/24