[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: a new lilypond build failure
From: |
Thomas Bushnell BSG |
Subject: |
Re: a new lilypond build failure |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:10:49 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> writes:
> What tex intricacies did you use? Integration with [la]tex documents
> is still supported, but using .eps snippets now.
Not many. I've never been a power lilypond user, and my needs would
be quite satisfied with .eps. I didn't much integrate it with tex,
but just produced pages and then ran tex on them to get output. I'd
be just as happy with .dvi output.
> The tex backend is still present. If there are problems with it,
> Han-Wen might be persuaded to support it as a sponsored feature?
It's not a bad thing, but it should not be a priority on my account.
Thomas
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, (continued)
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/10/24
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/10/24
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/10/24
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/10/24
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/10/24
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/10/24
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/10/24
- Re: a new lilypond build failure, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2005/10/24
- Re: a new lilypond build failure,
Thomas Bushnell BSG <=
- lilypond packaging, Thomas Bushnell BSG, 2005/10/23
- Re: lilypond packaging, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/10/23