[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cultivating typographical terminology: regression tests -> proofs
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: Cultivating typographical terminology: regression tests -> proofs |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:21:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:
> A lot of them don't test typography, but other aspects of Lily. If we
> change the name in any direction, I would recommend simply renaming it
> to "test"
I do not see what we gain by removing `regression'; I think regression
test is a good name.
To clarify: a test is added whenever a feature is added to show that
it works. At that point it automatically becomes a regression test to
verify a new release of lily does not regress?
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org