lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cultivating typographical terminology: regression tests -> proofs


From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Subject: Re: Cultivating typographical terminology: regression tests -> proofs
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:21:07 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Han-Wen Nienhuys writes:

> A lot of them don't test typography, but other aspects of Lily. If we
> change the name in any direction, I would recommend simply renaming it
> to "test"

I do not see what we gain by removing `regression'; I think regression
test is a good name.

To clarify: a test is added whenever a feature is added to show that
it works.  At that point it automatically becomes a regression test to
verify a new release of lily does not regress?

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]