[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Staff.instr code change?
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: Staff.instr code change? |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:32:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060501) |
Papazian Christophe schreef:
Yes !
I made some cleaning to obtain a diff as small as possible.
hello,
I don't understand your patch. How is it supposed to work?
Also, there are a lot of problems in the code, eg.
- global variables (tmp)
- non-uniform indentation
- undeclared properties
- why does the engraver keep a vector of previous text spanners?
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
LilyPond Software Design
-- Code for Music Notation
http://www.lilypond-design.com
- Staff.instr code change?, Kieren MacMillan, 2006/06/09
- Re: Staff.instr code change?, Papazian Christophe, 2006/06/11
- Re: Staff.instr code change?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/06/12
- Re: Staff.instr code change?, Papazian Christophe, 2006/06/12
- Re: Staff.instr code change?,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: Staff.instr code change?, Papazian Christophe, 2006/06/12
- Re: Staff.instr code change?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/06/12
- Re: Staff.instr code change?, Johannes Schindelin, 2006/06/12
- Re: Staff.instr code change?, Papazian Christophe, 2006/06/13
- Re: Staff.instr code change?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/06/13
- Re: Staff.instr code change?, Papazian Christophe, 2006/06/13
- Re: Staff.instr code change?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/06/13
- Re: Staff.instr code change?, Papazian Christophe, 2006/06/13
- Re: Staff.instr code change?, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/06/13
- Re: Staff.instr code change?, Kieren MacMillan, 2006/06/13