Re: Updating translators

[Erik Sandberg]

On Monday 10 July 2006 13:42, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> On 7/10/06, Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Erik Sandberg schreef:
> > >> Use C++ names in C++, and scheme names in scheme, i.e.
> > >>
> > >>    Foo_bar::bla_bla
> > >>
> > >> for handling a bla-bla-event.
> > >
> > > so do you also think that all stream-event classes should be named
> > > like 'arpeggio-event' rather than 'ArpeggioEvent'?
> > >
> > > Regarding bla_bla for classes, it makes me nervous about namespace
> > > clashes. Why not use Foo_bar::bla_bla_event?
> >
> > maybe
> >
> >    Foo_bar::listen_bla_bla
>
> ok, fair enough.

Attached is an updated version. Notes:
- The Scheme symbol for arpeggio events is arpeggio-event. This naming 
convention is different from previous event classes. We can make it more 
consistent later, when we have agreed on good naming conventions.
- The code that converts music name to event-class 
(ArpeggioEvent->arpeggio-event) is unclean and too C-ish. I'll fix that when 
the translator cleanup is finished and a better music->event conversion 
interface will be designed.

-- 
Erik

es-060711.diff
Description: Text Data