Re: git patch

[Jakub Narebski]

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:

> I think it would be more logical to show those diffs as part of
> git-status and perhaps git-commit, eg.
> 
>   git-commit --dry-run <commitoptions>
> 
> shows the diff of what would be committed
> 
>   git-status --diff
> 
> shows diffs of modified files in the working tree.
> 
> This makes it more clear what each diff means.

I'd rather say

  git-commit --diff

or

  git-diff --commit

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Warsaw, Poland
ShadeHawk on #git