Re: input/tolsr/

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

2007/5/2, Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> > I don't really understand the strategy here (I think I have
> > complained earlier too).
>
> 1)  Whenever I'm making new changes, the most important thing (in my
> mind) is that the new stuff is clearly better than (or at least equal)
> to the previous thing.  This "snippet subsection" is equal to the old
> system, so I'm happy pushing forward on this.

My gripe with it is that we're using the repository as a form of
communication. I think you will get more useful input if you use email
discussions for communication. If you position tolsr as dumping
ground, that is what you will get: dumped stuff, i.e. garbage.


> > As long as we all
> > agree that this is a temporary solution, waiting either for LSR
> > to support multiple LilyPond versions and always stay up to date
> > with the latest LilyPond releases or conversely for LSR to be fully
> > integrated with the LilyPond releases, then it's fine.
> I don't think that either of those will happen.  I agree that it makes
> life a bit harder for Trevor and the like... but I think we only have a
> dozen serious users who track unstable.

We run google analytics on lilypond.org. I've just added you as a
user. Go to http://www.google.com/analytics/  and login with your
Google account to see the reports.

I've switched on download tracking a few days ago. We have 50 devel
downloads per day.

--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen