Re: GDP: rearrangement

[Valentin Villenave]

2007/9/11, Till Rettig <address@hidden>:

Hello,

> For instance I could imagine
> a chapter "Ancient music", and one on educational subjects. At least I
> don't see why Ancient is "instrument specific", so why not put it in 7
> from the current suggestion, right after educational and special noteheads.

I'll let Graham do the talking on this one :)

> I am also somewhat unpleasant with the current "string" section in the
> instrument specific chapter: I would like to see here all those
> \bowdown, \bowup, \flageolet, \thumb and so on that are in
> "articulations" so far -- or at least a link to them. Well, that's
> already about contents, not only rearranging.

Yes, we should mention it (maybe in @seealso, or a @lsrtag link)

> I like the "text"-section, that is a good idea. But going the same way
> for other stuff as well... Name of chapter 7 should maybe be changed,
> not everything is about "decoration", there are some really important
> things. Would it be something like "polishing", "finishing" or the like?

Why does "decorating" have a negative meaning to everyone but me?
Your suggestions are fine too, though.

Regards,
Valentin