[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP pre-planning: Frog bugfixing
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: GOP pre-planning: Frog bugfixing |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:00:41 +0100 |
2008/12/11 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> No, I'm not "missing" it. Adding support for accordions or
> rewriting the slur code to avoid collisions between phrasing and
> normal slurs will take hours and hours, even for experienced
> developers. Fixing a "programming error" warning when the
> lilypond output is already perfect would only take a knowledgeable
> person a few minutes.
Don't worry, I'm not suggesting to replace your Frogs with mine :-)
Both sides are equally important, because it's the feature count that
makes users *and devs* stick with Lily.
> Once somebody has been doing small bugfixes for a few weeks,
> they'll naturally start taking on bigger and bigger things. The
> idea behind the Frogs is to get more people doing those small
> bugfixes. The other stuff will take care of itself.
Nothing takes care of itself. You taught me that :)
> Umm, like this?
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?q=label:Bounty
Nope, more like Jonathan's one (he's very clearly expressed why I
think this should work big time). And in a visible place.
Cheers,
Valentin
Re: GOP pre-planning: Frog bugfixing, Jonathan Kulp, 2008/12/11
Re: GOP pre-planning: Frog bugfixing, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/12/12