[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP pre-planning: Frog bugfixing
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: GOP pre-planning: Frog bugfixing |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:11:34 +0100 |
2008/12/12 Eyolf Østrem <address@hidden>:
> I don't know about the devs -- you're probably right that to them, new
> features are more interesting -- but THIS user sticks with LilyPond because
> the
> output is superb. As it is, LP deals with 99% of the western music notation
> canon, and to me, the perfectioning of that is far more important than
> filling in the remaining %.
> Also, a higher priority for me would be to simplify input for the 30% which
> go beyond simple music expressions and where scheme or fiddling with grob
> properties are required.
Eyolf: I think we agree on the need for more simplification, and if
you look at the feature requests, a lot of them are actually about
simpler input syntax rather than about adding "exotic" whole-new
features.
- for instance, a major feature request is to make LilyPond+editor
easier to install and to understand under Windows.
- another example: it would be nice to have one single command to
start a TextSpanner without having to \override TextSpanner
#'bound-details #'left #'text (I've already been working quite a lot
on this particular one).
So when I say "we should make requesting features and taking them into
account easier", I am also advocating for actually improving the
existing software.
Cheers,
Valentin
Re: GOP pre-planning: Frog bugfixing, Jonathan Kulp, 2008/12/11
Re: GOP pre-planning: Frog bugfixing, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/12/12