lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reorganization of Docs


From: Carl D. Sorensen
Subject: Re: Reorganization of Docs
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 23:14:28 -0700



On 1/1/09 9:51 PM, "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 07:04:36PM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>> I am working on a reorganization of LM6 Programming Interfaces.
> 
> Err, NR?

Uhhh -- Yep.  LM, NR, it's all the same thing after a late night ;)

> 
>> I have a section on displaying Scheme representations, and I want to add a
>> section on displaying LilyPond representations.
>> 
>> I propose that section 3.3.4. Displaying LilyPond notation move to LM 6.
> 
> Mao, this is confusing.  You're not proposing to add an entirely
> new chapter to the LM, containing nothing more than 3 paragraphs
> and 3 examples, right?
> 
> Assuming you're talking about the NR, I kind-of like that material
> where it is.  As the examples show, it can be useful for
> non-programming stuff.  How do you feel about a link in NR 6 to
> the current location?  I don't mind if you want to add a short
> example in NR 6 showing how to do this again, if it fits better
> with your narrative.
> 

Yeah, I'm talking about the NR.

How does the example in 3.3.4. show that it's useful for non-programming
stuff?  What's the use of it?

And why does it fit with output?  It has nothing to do with program output
-- it's just part of the console output.

I don't see the point of NR 3.3.4. -- it just seems to be a placeholder for
displayLilyMusic.  I think a better place for it is in NR 6.  But I'm open
to being convinced otherwise.

Once I get NR6 reworked, I'll post it for review.

Thanks,

Carl





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]