[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with imag
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images? |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:32:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> John Mandereau <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> David Kastrup wrote:
>>> So it would appear to be a problem that fc-match first finds the true
>>> type fonts installed by Canorus, and then this first match is
>>> subsequently thrown away by grep -v.
>>>
>>> So I think you need to figure out how to tell fc-match to prefer Type1
>>> over TrueType, or how to make it list all matches rather than a single
>>> one. Weeding out the Truetype when it has been listed _instead_ rather
>>> than in addition to the Type1 fonts will not do the trick.
>>>
>>
>> I haven't investigated far enough to be able to force Fontconfig to
>> prefer TTF over Type 1,
>
> I don't think mine does.
>
>> so I can't reproduce the problem you describe. Does the attached
>> patch help on your system? At least it doesn't break font selection
>> on my Fedora 9 system.
>
> I will try today evening, but since I already removed the canorus
> package and am not sure it was provided by my package repository, it
> might be that I will not be able to restore the system to a state
> susceptible to the problem. It may also be that the order of fonts will
> be different after reinstallation.
>
> So no promises. The patch looks plausible, though.
Ok, so the bad news: canorus was not in the package repository. So
reinstallation is not trivial: I have to dig it up and then install it.
And then it is likely that the version I'll be able to find will be
quite different from what I had installed previously (and which would
never have been updated after that). Probably not something I'll be
able to do before the weekend.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?, (continued)
- Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?, John Mandereau, 2009/03/13
- Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?, David Kastrup, 2009/03/13
- Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?, John Mandereau, 2009/03/14
- Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?, David Kastrup, 2009/03/15
- [PATCH] Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?, John Mandereau, 2009/03/17
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?, David Kastrup, 2009/03/17
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?, John Mandereau, 2009/03/18
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?, David Kastrup, 2009/03/18
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?, David Kastrup, 2009/03/18
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?, David Kastrup, 2009/03/18
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/03/18
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?, David Kastrup, 2009/03/18
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?, John Mandereau, 2009/03/18
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?, David Kastrup, 2009/03/18
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/03/18
- Re: [PATCH] Re: Why is it _still_ so freaking hard to get info with images?, David Kastrup, 2009/03/18